亚洲건달을 하지 않았다면, 우리는 행복할 수 있었을까?건달이 되면 멋진 남자로서 폼 나는 삶을 살 수 있을 거란 일념으로,배신한 선배를 물러나게 하고 마침내 보스의 자리까지 오른 ‘상곤’.하지만 그 일로 선배를 제낀 후배라는 오명을 쓰게 된다.형제보다 사랑하는 동생들과 의리를 맹세하고목숨보다 사랑하는 그녀와 행복까지 꿈꾸지만매일매일 피바람이 불어대는 지옥과 같은 이 곳에는건달들의 낭만 따위는 사치처럼 보이는데…건달들이 개입된 음모와 얽히고설킨 배신 속, 가족과 동생들까지점점 더 모든 것을 잃을 위기에 처하는 ‘상곤’.그가 마지막까지 지키고자 했던 것은 무엇이었을까?
孙辉
回复 :转自：http://www.filmlinc.com/nyff/2010/views-from-the-avant-garde-friday-october-1/views-from-the-avant-garde-jean-marie-straub“The end of paradise on earth.”—Jean-Marie StraubThe 33rd verse and last chant of “paradise” in Dante’s Divine Comedy. The film starts with verse 67, “O somma luce…” and continues to the end. “O Somma luce” recalls the first words uttered by Empedocles in Danièle Huillet and Jean-Marie Straub’s 1987 The Death of Empedocles—“O himmlisch Licht!…” (O heavenly light!). This extract from Hölderlin’s text is also inserted into their 1989 film Cézanne.“O somma luce” invokes utopia, or better still “u-topos,” Dante, Holderlin, Cézanne… the camera movement, recalling Sisyphus, in the film’s long shots, suggests its difficulty.In O somma luce, with Giorgio Passerone’s Dante and the verse that concluded the Divine Comedy, we find at the extremity of its possibilities, the almost happy speech of a man who has just left earthly paradise, who tries to fully realize the potential of his nature. Between the two we find the story of the world. The first Jean-Marie Straub film shot in HD.So singular are the textual working methods of Straub-Huillet, and now Straub on his own, that it is hard to grasp how far reaching they are. Direction is a matter of words and speech, not emotions and action. Nothing happens at the edges, everything is at the core and shines from there alone.During the rehearsals we sense a slow process by which ingredients (a text, actors, an intuition) progress towards cohesiveness. It is, forgive the comparison, like the kneading of dough. It is the assembling and working of something until it becomes something else… and, in this case, starts to shine. Actually it’s very simple, it’s just a question of opening up to the light material that has been sealed up. Here, the process of kneading is to bring to life and then reveal. The material that is worked on is speech. So it is speech that becomes visible—nothing else. “Logos” comes to the cinema.The mise en scène of what words exactly?The process of revealing, “phainestai”; “phainomenon,” the phenomenon, is what take splace, what becomes visible to the eye.Is “Straubie” Greece?This mise en scène of speech, which goes beyond a close reading of the chosen text, is truly comes from a distant source.—Barbara Ulrich
郭芯其
回复 :Alithea Binnie虽然对生活还算满意，但对世界却抱着怀疑的态度。在伊斯坦布尔，她遇到了一个精灵，后者向她提议用自由换取实现三个愿望。但Alithea学识非常渊博，她知道与许愿有关的故事都没有好结局。精灵于是向她解释了这么做的原因，并讲述了自己辉煌的过往。她被精灵讲述的故事所吸引，最终许下一个最令人惊讶的愿望。
邦尼泰勒
回复 :那时候，我们想要找的女孩。 哥哥，我给你的礼物。 粗糙的爱人脱掉内衣时除了无聊的日子的大学生光号。 爷爷病危的消息之间的时间是在亲戚家。 尴尬和冗长的亲戚们的见面中的记忆浮现。 忘了的纯真的回忆一起长大成人的表妹不允。 一套的她的视线吸引。不光是不允。 这是一样的。 “我们只有一杯呢？“ 互相表达的，但不能爱的人。 “你慢慢来。” 谁也不允许禁忌的爱，然后反转 十年后重逢的爱情，落实。
